That long-anticipated, doubtlessly nail-bitingly shut shareholder vote on whether or not music-rights purchaser Hipgnosis Songs Fund will have to proceed because it used to be? It grew to become out to be now not so shut in the end.
83.2% of the corporate’s shareholders voted in opposition to ‘continuation’ the day past, whilst additionally rejecting plans to promote $440m of its catalogues to sister fund Hipgnosis Songs Capital.
Oh, they usually additionally ejected the fund’s chair Andrew Sutch with speedy impact, in spite of his plan to surrender subsequent yr.
What occurs now? The Hipgnosis Songs Fund board will now put ahead “proposals for the reconstruction, reorganisation or completing of the Corporate” throughout the subsequent six months.
“Whilst shareholders have now not supported our proposed transaction or the continuation vote, it’s transparent that they percentage our trust within the inherent high quality and doable of those property,” mentioned senior impartial director Sylvia Coleman.
That view used to be reflected by means of founder Merck Mercuriadis. “Our conversations with shareholders have published a consensus that they’re the standard of the Corporate’s iconic portfolio of songs, alternatively it’s also transparent that they’re requesting trade and we appreciate that comments,” he mentioned in a separate observation.
The problem for Hipgnosis is that whilst its shareholders would possibly percentage its trust within the price of song rights, it has a large number of paintings to do to persuade them to percentage its trust that it’s the proper corporate – a minimum of in its present shape – to profit from that price.
Equipment: platforms that will help you succeed in new audiences
Equipment :: Afterparty
We’ve not too long ago reported that the startup Afterparty raised $5m of investment for its superfan platform.…
Allow 48h for review and removal.